Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Buddhist Monasticism in China and Christian Monasticism in Europe (Essay)

This is a theme paper that I wrote for my world history class. I'm comparing two forms of monasticism, Buddhist and Christian. I hope this can be helpful.

Since the ancient time, religion has played an important role in our society, considering the fact that people were relying on it to explain the purpose of life and to keep a balanced society. Hence, religion seemed to be determining what was good, what was bad and what was considered perfection. Those who wanted to take a step closer to this perfection in life have devoted their lives to their religion, hence the creation of monasticism. In China, monasticism was based on the teaching in Buddhism. At the same period of time, Christian monasticism could be found in Europe. These two monastic traditions possessed a common goal and similar lifestyles, with some differences in their history and the daily routine of a monk. Additionally, these institutions also provided some positive and negative influences on their societies.

Buddhism follows the teaching of Siddhartha Gautama, or the Buddha. Eastern Asia, which includes China, Japan and Korea, adapted Mahayana Buddhism. The main goal in this religion is to achieve nirvana, which is a state of nothingness and freedom from reincarnation (McKay 67). Christianity, on the other hand, follows the teaching of Jesus of Nazareth (McKay 148). Christian followers started to choose ascetic life because they had a deep belief and wanted to devote their life to God. Subsequently, those people formed together and created a community that followed a monastic lifestyle. In Europe, Christianity was split into various types of monasticism. Eventually, the monastic life of Benedict became the significant form of monasticism. The main goal in this religion is to be closer to God (McKay 191). Followers of both religions decided to choose monastic lifestyles for different purposes, but in the end, monasticism will lead them to the spiritual perfection.
One of the differences that set these two traditions apart is the contrasting definition of spiritual perfection in Buddhism and Christianity and the reasons that both societies chose their religions. For instance, in addition to its role in unifying China, this civilization adapted Buddhism because the concept of reincarnation, karma and nirvana heavily fascinated Chinese people. Hence, monasticism lead them to realize that there is a way to escape all the sufferings and achieve nirvana (McKay 169). While in Europe, Christianity was widely spread and accepted because their citizens had been through a tough time of war and social discrimination. As a result, Christianity at that time made them feel secured and equal, which made God someone they could trust and depended on (McKay 150). Likewise, Christian follower believed that becoming a monk or a nun could lead them to immortality and be close to God (McKay 191).
In terms of lifestyle, Buddhist and Christian monks and nuns lived a similar simple life. They isolated themselves from other people so that they were able to concentrate on their spiritual lives and stayed away from any sort of distraction. They also had to give up all their possessions and any pleasurable activities, and took vows of simplicity, chastity and obedience. Once a Christian monk entered the monasteries, he no longer has anything of his own, not even a book or a pen (Ward 170). Comparatively, in Buddhism, the process of becoming a monk started with shaving his head as act of letting go of all the attachments which also includes their family (Ward 159). Additionally, Buddhist monks had to wear yellow monk gowns and gave up the consumption of meat and alcohol (Heirman 265).
Their daily routine were completely differently from a regular laypeople for the purpose of getting them ready to fully understand the religion and reach their goal of perfection, and at the same time surviving the present. In order to eliminate their attachment to the world, Buddhist monks need to meditate and chant daily (Ward 159). Similarly, in a Christian monastery, monks were always occupied by manual labor and sacred reading, because they believed that idleness is the enemy of the soul. Therefore, monks spent their entire day doing labor, such as picking fruits, and read books or pray during their free time (Ward 170). Evidently, both practices of monasticism were the same in terms of finding the state of calmness by staying connected with their religion and taking their mind off the world. However, some slight differences that separated these two traditions can be found in the ways they sustained their lives. Since monks did not possess anything as their own, Christian monks receive their basic needs from the Father of the monastery. They lived together as a community and survived on the labor of their own hands (Ward 170). Buddhist monk, on the other hand, subsisted with the help of donation from Buddhist laypeople. They provided food, clothes and other things required to live for the monks. In addition, Buddhist monks also had a begging bowl and received some of those basic needs during alms round at a local town (Heirman 267).
Surprisingly, at one point, both civilization were not pleased with the practice of monasticism in their societies. In the Roman Empire, for example, some women decided to stay a virgin and avoid marriage. This is viewed as against the foundation of Roman society, which is maintaining the power of paterfamilias. Therefore, in order to keep the stability of this religion in Roman civilization, female believers were restricted, and later forbidden from preaching and having high positions in Christianity (McKay 193). Furthermore, the church ministers were not pleased by those who pursue ascetic lifestyle because there were claims that they were able to directly communicate with God. This was a threat to them as this communication could only be made possible with the help of priests and bishops (McKay 191). Similar conflict appeared in China, where monasticism was also criticized because the whole concept of this practice were against the teaching of Confucius, which had been influencing ancient China before the spread of Buddhism. From the perspective of Confucius’ followers, because monks and nuns spend their time solely focusing the religion, they were unable to perform labor service, which contribute to the development of Chinese society (Wishon Lecture 24, 22 Apr. 2015). Additionally, to enter the monkhood, a man is required to give up his family name and also take a vow of celibacy. This was a threat to the society of ancient China, as it is today, since the surname of a man and a family is heavily valued by the Chinese society (McKay 169). Therefore, if a man decided to become a monk, the family not only lost a family member, but they also lost a chance to have a son who will continue to glorify the legacy of their surname (Ward 159).
Despite causing some inconvenience to their societies, monasticism actually took part in the development of both civilizations at that period of time. Notably, because Christian monks survived on their own, they have to come up with a way to produce food for themselves. Therefore, they had to clear out land and wasteland to farm crops for their community. This drastically improved the agricultural system in Europe. In addition, monasteries provided a place for local young people an opportunity to learn. Hence, this contributed to the huge amount of literacy in the society (McKay 192). Another influence of monasticism was the appreciation of women's role in societies and religion. In the past, women were not broadly accepted, as they were consider a lower class compared to men. Buddhism, on the contrary, provided a safe place for women since women were also highly appreciated in the monastery. In China, a significant amount of women entered the monastery as Buddhist nuns. Commonly, the choice of joining nunnery was made because women tried to avoid marriage or living with the in-laws when their husbands passed away. This also gave Chinese women a chance to value themselves because they were not a burden to their society and, simultaneously, able to help spread the teaching of Buddha to other people, especially other women (McKay 170).

In conclusion, monasticism was a great stepping stone for people from those civilization to reach what they believed was the perfection in life, but it posed different beneficial influences and conflicts in their societies. It is also interesting to note that despite having slightly different lifestyles, ultimately the monks and nuns from two completely different civilizations were having one similar goal, and they were helping one another as well as their societies.


Works cited
Hierman, Ann. "Indian Disciplinary Rules And Their Early Chinese Adepts: A Buddhist Reality." Journal Of The American Oriental Society 128.2 (2008): 257-272. Religion and Philosophy Collection. Web. 20 Apr. 2015.
McKay, John P., Bennett D. Hill, et al. Understanding World Societies. A Brief History Vol.1: To 1600. Boston: Bedford/St.Martins's, 2013. Print.
Ward, Walter D., and Denis Gainty. Sources of World Societies. Vol. 1: To 1600. 2nd ed. Boston: Bedford/St.Martins's, 2012. Print.
Wishon, Mark. “World History I, Lecture 24” San Diego Mesa College, San Diego, CA. 22 Apr. 2015


No comments:

Post a Comment